Systematic risk, Unsystematic risk, and Systemic risk

Systematic risk, unsystematic risk, and systemic risk are essential concepts in quantitative finance and risk management. Here’s a detailed explanation of each term in quantitative terminology:

  1. Systematic Risk: It is also known as market risk or undiversifiable risk, is the inherent risk associated with the entire market or a specific asset class. It cannot be eliminated through diversification because it is related to macroeconomic factors, such as interest rates, inflation, or overall market conditions. Quantitative Terminology: In quantitative analysis, systematic risk is often quantified using beta (β). Beta measures the sensitivity of an asset’s returns to changes in the overall market. A beta of 1 indicates that the asset moves in line with the market, while a beta greater than 1 signifies higher sensitivity and a beta less than 1 suggests lower sensitivity.
  2. Unsystematic Risk: It is also known as idiosyncratic risk or specific risk, is the risk associated with a specific company or industry. It arises from factors such as company management, product performance, or competition, and it can be reduced or eliminated through diversification. In quantitative finance, unsystematic risk is often quantified using metrics like standard deviation, tracking error, or residual variance. These metrics help quantify the deviation of an asset’s returns from its expected or benchmark returns, reflecting the degree of unsystematic risk.
  3. Systemic Risk: It is the risk that is inherent to the entire financial system and affects the stability and functioning of financial markets. It arises from interconnectedness and dependencies among financial institutions, making it difficult to mitigate through diversification. Systemic risk can be assessed quantitatively using various models, such as network models and stress testing. Network models analyze the interconnections between financial institutions and assess the potential impact of the failure of one institution on the entire system. Stress testing involves simulating extreme scenarios to evaluate how the financial system would respond to severe shocks.

A detailed explanation of Systematic, Unsystematic, and Systemic risk with examples

Systematic Risk

Systematic risk is the component of risk that is beyond an investor’s control. It results from external factors and market-wide events that affect the prices of most or all assets. This type of risk is not unique to a particular company, industry, or asset class but is a common risk shared by the entire market. Systematic risk is influenced by economic, political, and environmental factors, and it can lead to the rise or fall of entire markets, industries, or asset classes.

Example of Systematic Risk:

Let’s consider a hypothetical example to illustrate systematic risk:

Suppose you are an investor with a diversified portfolio that includes stocks from various industries, bonds, and real estate. You have no control over the broader market conditions. Here’s how systematic risk might manifest:

  1. Economic Recession: The economy enters a recession due to a global financial crisis. During a recession, consumer spending decreases, unemployment rises, and corporate profits decline. As a result, the stock market experiences a significant decline, and your equity investments lose value. This systematic risk affects nearly all stocks and asset classes in your portfolio, and it cannot be avoided through diversification.
  2. Interest Rate Changes: Central banks decide to raise interest rates to combat inflation. Higher interest rates lead to a decrease in bond prices. Even though you hold a diversified bond portfolio, your fixed-income investments are affected by the systemic risk associated with interest rate changes. The entire bond market is impacted by these changes.
  3. Natural Disaster: A severe natural disaster, such as a hurricane or earthquake, strikes a region with a high concentration of your real estate investments. The widespread damage and destruction negatively affect the real estate market, causing the value of your real estate holdings to decline. This systematic risk is beyond your control and affects real estate assets broadly.

In these scenarios, systematic risk is the common factor causing losses in different asset classes within your portfolio. Diversification can help reduce unsystematic risk, which is unique to specific assets, but it cannot eliminate systematic risk because it is tied to external, market-wide events. Investors and portfolio managers need to be aware of systematic risk and consider it in their risk management and asset allocation strategies. Various financial instruments and hedging techniques can be used to mitigate the impact of systematic risk, such as using options, futures, or asset allocation adjustments

UnSystematic Risk

Unsystematic risk is the component of risk that is specific to a particular investment or group of investments. It arises from factors that are unique to a company, industry, or asset class. This type of risk can be attributed to internal events or circumstances, such as company management, product performance, competition, and supply chain issues. Unsystematic risk can often be mitigated through diversification, which involves holding a diversified portfolio of assets to reduce exposure to the specific risks associated with individual investments

Example of Unsystematic Risk:

Let’s consider a hypothetical example to illustrate unsystematic risk:

Suppose you have invested in several different stocks from various industries within your portfolio. Here’s how unsystematic risk might manifest:

  1. Company-Specific Events: One of the companies in which you have invested faces a series of internal problems. It might include a product recall, a CEO scandal, or labor strikes. These issues are specific to that company and negatively impact its stock price. However, these problems do not affect the entire market or other companies in your portfolio.
  2. Industry-Specific Challenges: You hold stocks in the technology sector. A trade dispute between two countries leads to tariffs that specifically impact technology companies. As a result, the stock prices of technology companies in your portfolio experience a decline. This is an example of industry-specific unsystematic risk.
  3. Supply Chain Disruption: Another company in your portfolio depends on a single supplier for a critical component. A disruption in the supplier’s operations due to unforeseen circumstances leads to production delays for this company. The stock price of this company declines due to this supply chain issue, while other companies in your portfolio remain unaffected.

In these scenarios, unsystematic risk is at play. The risks are specific to individual companies or industries and can be mitigated through diversification. By holding a diversified portfolio that includes assets from various sectors and industries, you reduce your exposure to the specific risks affecting individual investments. Unsystematic risk highlights the importance of not putting all your investment capital into a single asset or industry, as diversification can help spread and reduce these specific risks.

Risk management and diversification strategies are essential tools for managing unsystematic risk and ensuring a more balanced and resilient investment portfolio.

Systemic Risk

Systemic risk is a critical concept in finance and economics, and it refers to the risk of a widespread and often catastrophic failure or disruption within a financial system or market. It is not limited to individual companies or assets but has the potential to affect the entire financial system, including banks, financial institutions, markets, and even the broader economy. Understanding systemic risk is crucial for financial stability and risk management.

Systemic risk is characterized by the following key elements:

  1. Interconnectedness: It arises from the interconnected relationships between financial institutions and markets. The failure of one entity can trigger a domino effect, leading to the failure of other related institutions, and causing a cascade of financial distress.
  2. Contagion: Systemic risk often involves contagion, where financial stress or the failure of one institution spreads to others, creating a broader crisis. Contagion can occur due to direct exposure (e.g., interbank lending) or indirect exposure (e.g., a loss of confidence in the financial system).
  3. Amplification: Systemic risk has the potential to magnify the impact of financial disruptions. A relatively small initial shock can lead to much larger consequences throughout the financial system and the broader economy.
  4. Macro-Level Impact: Systemic risk extends beyond individual assets or firms and has macro-level consequences. It can lead to severe economic contractions, bank runs, and a loss of confidence in the financial system.

Sources of Systemic Risk:

Several factors contribute to systemic risk:

  1. Financial Interconnectedness: Institutions in the financial system often have complex interconnections, including interbank lending, derivatives contracts, and shared counterparty risk. A problem in one institution can quickly affect others.
  2. Liquidity Shortages:  A sudden shortage of liquidity in the financial system can lead to a liquidity crisis, with institutions struggling to meet their short-term obligations.
  3. Market Shocks: Significant market events, such as a stock market crash or a sudden increase in interest rates, can propagate systemic risk by impacting the value of assets and the stability of institutions.
  4. Credit and Counterparty Risk: Failure to accurately assess and manage credit risk, especially in lending and derivative transactions, can result in systemic risk.
  5. Operational Risk:  Failures in operational processes or cybersecurity vulnerabilities can disrupt financial systems, impacting multiple institutions.

Regulators and central banks play a crucial role in mitigating systemic risk. They implement prudential regulations, stress tests, and oversight measures to ensure the stability of the financial system. The goal is to identify vulnerabilities and implement safeguards that can mitigate the impact of systemic risk.

Example of Systemic Risk:

The global financial crisis of 2007-2008 serves as a significant example of systemic risk. The collapse of the housing bubble in the United States triggered a financial crisis that spread worldwide. Financial institutions were interconnected through complex financial products tied to subprime mortgages. When these products failed, it led to a systemic crisis, with bank failures, stock market crashes, and a global economic downturn.

Understanding systemic risk is essential for financial stability, and efforts to reduce and mitigate it are ongoing to prevent such crises in the future.

Conclusion

Quantitative analysts and risk managers use these concepts to understand and measure different types of risk in financial markets. Systematic and unsystematic risks are relevant at the asset level, whereas systemic risk concerns the broader financial system. Accurate quantification and management of these risks are essential for portfolio optimization, risk assessment, and financial stability analysis.